Friday, May 18, 2012

Coming of Age Novel: Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

The coming of age novel that I chose for this unit was Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Johnathon Safran Foer. This book is about a young boy, Oskar Schell, who embarks on a journey through clues that his dad left him just before being killed in 9/11. There are many factors that contribute to the unique coming-of-age of this boy, including the death of his father, how his mother decided to move on, and the irregular "support" from his family, or lack there of.

One of the reasons Oskar has had an unusual coming-of-age (so far in his life) is because of the untimely death of his father. Having lost him on the morning of September 11, it was a particularly tough time for Oskar, because his father hadn't even seen him grow up yet. Losing your father, or you mother, at a young age is sure to have a great impact on the rest of your life. I'm sure that it's tough for Oskar to have to live without his dad especially because it was his father. Oskar had a stronger connection with his father than he does with his mother because he got everything he knew from his father, and they were extremely similar in character and personality. Oskar is the kind of kid where he's extremely smart, so he always asks a lot of questions. His father was one of the single people in his life that could deal with him in a way that was playful and educational at the same time. For example, Oskar's dad is tucking him in at night when he suddenly has the need to ask random questions related to science: " "Obviously, but why is there gravity?" He said, "What do you mean why is there gravity?" "What's the reason?" "Who said there had to be a reason?" "No one did, exactly." "My question was rhetoriacal." "What's that mean?" "It means I wasn't asking for an answer, but to make a point." "What point?" "That there doesn't have to be a reason." "(pg 12-13). This is just one example of how Oskar and his dad really did have a connection that no one could replace.

Another reason that the last reason led to was Oskar's mom's moving on. Shortly after his father died, Oskar's mother started really being around this guy Ron. Ron would come to most of their dinners, be with his mom all day, go to Oskar's school events, and other things as well. Whenever Oskar asks his mother about Ron, she denies any suspected love life. For example, on page 35: " "True or false: you are in love with Ron." She put her hand with the ring on it in her hair and said, "Oskar, Ron is my friend." " But even though his mom shows no real signs of having a love life with him, I highly suspect that Oskar thinks she does, jusr because that would be the worst possible situation on her part. It was devestate Oskar if he found out that his mom was going out with another guy just after his dad had died. On one hand, you can give her a little credit for being courageous enough for trying (and maybe succeeding) to move on, even though it may not look good. But on the other hand, itd not right because it's giving Oskar the idea that she doesn't really care about his dad and doesn't think much of him dying. Oskar doesn't really know who to go to about his feelings for this because he knows that his mom won't necessarily tell him the whole truth. Oskar feels insecure about things like this so he goes crazy sometimes and doesn't make sense, or lashes out.

Im absolutely positive that Oskar Schell does not have the most pleasant experience growing up. His dad died not too long ago, and his mom seems to not care that much and want to move on (at least on the outside from Oskar's perspective). I hope that for Oskar's sake, he learns to cope with the things in his life, and I hope that he discovers what the clues have been meaning to lead him to...

Friday, April 13, 2012

Essay

"Why Trees Matter"
By Jim Robbins
nytimes.com

People may not realize how important some factors of our environment are to life. In the article Why Trees Matter, by Jim Robbins, there are many ways in which the author describes different reasons as to why trees matter.

One reason why trees are important is because they supply other animals with food. For example, something that not many people knew was that trees release an acid into the ocean that provides food for plankton. This leads to the whole food chain "thriving" more because all of the populations above the plankton are helped as well. Trees also give termites wood, and give all living things oxygen.

Another reason why trees are very important to the environment is because trees do things for our bodies. When you take a walk in the park where there are a lot of trees, the level of stress chemicals in your body decrease and the level of fighting cells in your immune system. Trees also release a lot of other chemical "clouds" that are good for you, chemicals that help the climate and our bodies. The main chemical in Apsrin comes from willow trees. Another chemical that comes from trees, taxane, has been a successful treatment of some cancers.

From this article, I've learned that we really should preserve our environment, because trees are very important to nature. People shouldn't be cutting down trees and building buildings, they should be thankful that we have such a reliable source to fix many of earths problems.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Plagiarism Questions

What did the student do wrong? What could he/she have done to include the source correctly?
The student plagiarized someone elses writing! They just copy and pasted someones work and called it their own without even citing any sources as to where they got it from. The student could have used the work they took from someone else as a quote, and then cited the website they got it from or who wrote it in the first place.

Write a sentence using the original source correctly; use a quotation or paraphrase.
"There is a peaceful essence flowing from the structures. Perhaps the cool dark colors and the fiery windows spark memories of our own warm childhood years filled with imagination of what exists in the night and dark starry skies. The center point of the town is the tall steeple of the church, reigning largely over the smaller buildings. This steeple casts down a sense of stability onto the town, and also creates a sense of size and seclusion.To the left of the painting there is a massive dark structure that develops an even greater sense of size and isolation." (A Breif Understanding of the Starry Night Paintings, unknown author).

What are at least three ways to avoid plagiarism?
1. Make sure you cite all sources if you took writing from someone else
2. Don't try to copy other people's work in the first place
3. Type what you wrote in a search box and check if it was used by someone else already

2 Favorite Blog Posts

My two favorite blog posts out of everyone on the list had to be Gabby's and Eliza's. In Gabby's post about social issues in Glass by Ellen Hopkins, I really enjoyed how she goes deeper into the story than what's just written in the book. She makes a lot of inferences and backs them up well with elaboration and textual evidence. Another thing I liked about Gabby's post was how she took different elements of her main idea and broke them up into different sections of the post, instead of just cramming them into one big paragraph. This made it a lot easier for a reader to follow and understand. In Eliza's post, I really like how she analyzes the two characters and compare-and-contrasts them. It really shows that she has a true understanding of each individual character. I also like how Eliza asks questions at the end of the post. I admire the fact that she really wants to make a connection with the reader.

In my future blog posts, I definitely will make some changes, and take pointers from these blogs. I'm going to make sure to have textual evidence at all times, and maybe even include some quotes, like Gabby. I'll elaborate with much detail but make sure to get to the point and not go off topic. To improve my blog posts I'll also try and take little pieces of the book that I'm reading (like two specific chraracters) and compare and contrast them, instead of just doing a review-like post on the whole book, like Eliza. I'll also maybe even ask questions at the end of the post about what the reader thinks.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Reading Response- John Green [Due 1/27]


The two books that I have read by John Green were fantastic. (This post is about an author I like.)

The first book that I read by him was Looking for Alaska. This book was about how these boys (who were kind of dorks) went off to college and one of them met this girl that had an instant connection with him. It was a strange connection because she was some mysterious girl that he had just met yet the boy felt like he had known her his whole life. Her name was Alaska, and Alaska was this crazy girl with a messed-up family and a crazy outgoing attitude and strong passions for many unusual things. In the end, the boy ended up having to help her with something that's a bigger favor than anything else in the world, and the boy and Alaska end up caring for eachother more than any two people ever have. I liked this book mainly because I love how Green constructed Alaska. Even though she wasn't the main character she definitely had a stronger personality than any other character in the book. Green had her do crazy things like drunk drive and always want to take long road trips and make wax volcanoes from candles in her dorm. I thought that it would be cool to have a life like that, just freewilled and willing to do just whatever (except drunk drive, Ms. Galang!). I appreciated this because I know that it is important to an author to try and make the text and the characters somehow relate to the reader so they can understand the story better and more clearly.

The other book that I just finished for the second time was Paper Towns. This book was about something extremely similar yet so different! It was about how a boy (Quentin) and his friends were kind of nerdy in school and they all admired this one girl, Margo Spiegelman. This girl was basically Alaskas character, except she also had some insecurities about herself that she only revealed to Quentin. Towards the middle of the book Margo goes missing and leaves clues for Quentin to try and find her. Margo and Quentin too also have a strangely deep connection. The two are family friends and didn't really know each other before but after spending some time together they really "hit it off". This book was similar to Looking for Alaska in that they both have a guy main character who admires this crazy girl in a weird way, but in the end they both end up having really deep connections for eachother, and something bad happens, then its all better! (kind of)

Reading Response- Paper Towns [Due 1/6]

I just recently finished the book Paper Towns  by John Green for the second time. I had to have the story again- it was such a great read! This time I looked for something different besides the relationship between Quentin and Margo. This time through the book I noticed mostly things about Margo Roth Spiegelman and got a deeper look into her personality.

The first time I read this book I was more focused on the main plot in the story and what was going on with Quentin since he's the main character. This time around I focused in more on Margo because I knew that she's a secondary character and I wanted to pay closer attention to her and her role in the book. I noticed that in the beginning of the book when Quention and Margo don't really know eachother that well and Quentin admires Margo from afar, Margo seems like this stuck up-popular-cheerleader that always gets what she wants and has (of course) an amazing popular boyfriend who's the hottest kid in school. From far away, Margo seems like the kind of girl who would never want to be involved with someone like Quentin or people like Quentin's friends (Ben and Radar). It surprised me how weird it was between the two characters even though they had been some kind of family-friends since they were born. But Quentin totally got the wrong impression of who she was.

I think that Quentin got this wrong impression because he saw how Margo acted on the outside, but also because that's how Margo wanted to portray herself to the rest of the world. I think that Margo wanted people to think that she was this crazy outgoing girl that always gets everything she wants and has people waiting on her hand and foot because she's so pretty and popular and perfect. I'm not really sure why though. Maybe it's because she didn't want to show everyone who she really was.

I don't know the answer to this either- I don't know why Margo wouldn't want to show everyone who she really was, because personally? I like the real inside- Margo a lot better than the fake one on the outside. This "real Margo" really came out when she went missing and left clues for Quentin to find her. I think it was sweet of her to want only Quentin to find her, which he eventually does anyway. I like the Margo on the inside a lot beter!

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Harlem by Langston Hughes

Harlem by Langston Hughes
 
What happens to a dream deferred?

Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore—
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over—
like a syrupy sweet?


Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.


Or does it explode?

I really like this poem by Langston Hughs because it shows different ways to think about topics that you wouldn't normally think about, like dreams. a dream is a really interesting topic to write a poem about because there are so many ways to express yourself in poetry, on top of being able to write many things about dreams. In this poem, Hughes describes what can happen when you put off something that you've been dreaming about for a while.

"Deferred" means to be put off, and not looked at for a long time. The beginning line in the poem is very good because it sets things up for the rest of the poem. What happens to a dream deferred? is also a very good opening line because it is a question, and questions make you think about a lot of things, and often bring you into the next lines of the poem.

In the first stanza, Langston Hughes gives examples of many things that a dream will do if "deferred". Hughes gives examples like "Does it dry up/ like a raison in the sun?" and "Or does it fester like a sore--/ then run?" Notice how both of these examples are also questions, like the beginning line. I think one of the techniques that Hughes used to draw the reader in was to ask the reader questions to keep them engaged and thinking. The examples from the text also have other literary devices such as personification and similes.

In the second stanza of the poem, things kind of calm down a little. He only states one this time, and its more general than the other components, so you can tell that it's more important. The fact that this line in the poem does not pose a question makes you wonder if that was the thing that the dream deferred actually does. Maybe it's what happens to a "dream deferred" in Hughes' eyes. This could keep me thinking for hours!

The last line of the poem is very mysterious, and I have to admit that it scares me a little. I've never really analyzed this line before because I didn't really think that it meant much, but from reading it over and over again I realized that this is the most important line in the poem. This line is a question again ("Or does it explode?") and it makes me wonder if dreams deferred actually do "explode". I think that this is a metaphor for that they do explode, in peoples minds. The dreams plot themselves in peoples minds when they're not thinking about them and then one day, the person realizes that they're still there, and suddenly cares when its gone, when they forget about it.